Want to Die From Cancer? – Get Chemotherapy

iv drip

A new study (NOTE: link is invalid, see update at end of article) from mainstream sources has not only confirmed that chemotherapy does more harm than good, but discovers the mechanism by which chemotherapy almost ensures death by cancer. This finding is nothing new to those who have much experience with the medical industry’s track record in treating cancer. The typical process experienced by most cancer patients is as follows:

  1. Get biopsy confirming cancer
  2. Become scared and sign up for whatever treatment the doctor recommends – usually chemotherapy
  3. Endure months of living hell (from the chemo) and withdraw from normal life
  4. Doctor declares the cancer is gone and a new day dawns
  5. Six months to a year later, the cancer returns
  6. More chemo, radiation, etc. – nothing works now and despair begins to set in
  7. Doctor says nothing more can be done and gives up
  8. Patient looks to natural alternatives and usually heads to Mexico
  9. By this time, even natural methods don’t work and patient finally succumbs

I don’t have exact statistics, but I would venture that this scenario is played out with some variation about 90% of the time or more. As I mentioned in this article, as long as the patient lives past 5 years from the first diagnosis, he is considered cured by the industry and government statistics. Natural practitioners have long suspected that chemotherapy causes irreparable damage to the immune system leaving patients completely helpless to combat any recurrence of the cancer. Now at last we know why.

Here are some highlights from this landmark study and its reporting in the news:

Chemotherapy can cause damage to healthy cells which triggers them to secrete a protein that sustains tumour growth and resistance to further treatment.

Researchers in the United States made the “completely unexpected” finding while seeking to explain why cancer cells are so resilient inside the human body when they are easy to kill in the lab.

They tested the effects of a type of chemotherapy on tissue collected from men with prostate cancer, and found “evidence of DNA damage” in healthy cells after treatment.

The scientists found that healthy cells damaged by chemotherapy secreted more of a protein called WNT16B which boosts cancer cell survival.

WNT16B, when secreted, would interact with nearby tumour cells and cause them to grow, invade, and importantly, resist subsequent therapy.

In cancer treatment, tumours often respond well initially, followed by rapid regrowth and then resistance to further chemotherapy.

Rates of tumour cell reproduction have been shown to accelerate between treatments.

The facts couldn’t be stated better. For those who are still in denial over the deadly prospects of chemotherapy, mainstream science now stands against you. To continue to rely on and use these deadly poisons is suicide.

Natural Alternatives

While natural treatments for cancer is beyond the scope of this article, here are some easy ways to help prevent and even slow cancer progression:

Avoid All Unnecessary Starches and Sugars

Sugar feeds cancer and starches found in grains and potatoes are nothing more than sugar when they enter the body. Vegetable juices should also be avoided as they are typically heavily loaded with carrot juice which is mostly sugar. Remember – sugar feeds cancer, sugar feeds cancer, sugar feeds cancer.

Take Omega-3 Fatty Acids

Cancer is the body’s healing mechanism gone wild. It is the result of excess inflammation in the body. This inflammation is caused by a diet heavy in carbohydrates (sugar) along with vegetable oils. Avoid all vegetable oils except for olive and coconut oil. Eat grass-fed meat and dairy when possible.

In addition to minimizing your intake of inflammation causing oils, you should supplement your diet with large amounts of inflammation reducing oils. The best of these oils is omega-3 fatty acids from fish. Most store bought oils, including cod liver oil, are very diluted and you would need to consume more than you would care to in order to have any benefit. I recommend this concentrated fish oil from NOW Foods. It is very cost effective and you won’t have to take nearly as many to get the benefits that you need.

Take Vitamin D3

We normally get vitamin D3 from the sun.  Most of us don’t get as much sun as we need, especially during the cooler months. Studies have found that even those living in Hawaii fail to get enough sun to provide adequate vitamin D3 levels. How important is this vitamin to preventing cancer? It is so vital that numerous studies have shown a direct correlation between latitude and cancer occurrence. Those living in warmer climates experience much lower cancer rates.

You don’t have to move to Florida to use this vitamin to prevent cancer. You can take it cheaply in pill form. Many forms of vitamins use the D2 form which is not natural and is toxic. The D3 form is the safe and natural one and most people should consider taking 5,000 IUs each day. That sounds like a lot, but this this small pill from NOW Foods provides exactly that for only pennies per day.

Conclusion

If you or a loved one is diagnosed with cancer, please consider alternatives to chemotherapy. Natural practitioners have long known of its deadliness and now mainstream science both confirmed it and has shown why. Don’t expect doctors to change their practices either. This study will be ignored and the cancer industry will continue unchanged for years to come.

It is time for all of us to take our health care back into our own hands. It is the only way to health and safety.

UPDATE: the original article (on news.yahoo.com) has been pulled. Here is a similar report from google.com. Also, per a reader request, here is the reference for the original study (it costs $32 to view a copy) - Treatment-induced damage to the tumor microenvironment promotes prostate cancer therapy resistance through WNT16B

This entry was posted in Health and tagged , . Section: . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

4 Comments

  1. Boo Radley
    Posted November 2, 2012 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    This is written with no respect for the reader.
    The reader wants an objective take with well referenced sources. Not news.yahoo as an inline citation. The link was dead by the way.
    Your tone throughout this essay is clearly biased towards non-conventional treatments for cancer,
    however you provide no evidence for anything you espouse. If you came to your conclusions with information as dubious as this essay, then you need to look at some evidence. However if you have evidence, feel free to use it in an essay.

    Rewrite the essay.

    • Posted November 7, 2012 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

      Boo,

      Despite the dubious name you have given yourself, I will address your comment in all seriousness and sincerity. This author means no disrespect for you or anyone else. Unfortunately, the subject of cancer is a highly sensitive one (even more-so than politics and religion) and any suggestion that the conventional medical treatment is tainted by ignorance, fraud, corruption or even simple human error is likely to invite violent invectives by some who have lost loved ones to this terrible disease.

      This author also has no control over dubious news sources which alter or pull their articles in the manner of ’1984′ as yahoo.com has done. I have updated the article with both a reference to a similar news article along with a reference to the actual study. You can’t refute this evidence. As I alluded in the article, the citations from this study are more damning of conventional cancer treatment than entire books of alternative methods could even do.

      Regarding evidence for the suggestions I have given, I refer you to the book AntiCancer, A New Way of Life (shown from Amazon alongside the article). These simple suggestions are really basic and harmless to everyone except those who do not want to face the facts.

      Yes, the article does reflect my bias. All articles are biased, regardless of the author – I don’t pretend to not have any as do those in the mainstream media. Instead, I lay my bias open for inspection. You are welcome to take it or leave it.

      • B.MONDRAGON
        Posted January 4, 2013 at 5:55 am | Permalink

        Let’s point out that its true by an example that will allow you to picture how it works let’s call it an analogy….
        You find out u have a growth but it “can’t be cut” so they offer chemotherapy.
        You suffer months….
        Picture a burn on your skin . The burn will form a liquid filled blister. The heat turns the flesh into a liquid…. if u do not intentionally pop the blister the burn is sore rather than painful if u leave the blister unpoped it returns to normal.
        Okay so imagine chemo as. The fire turning the tumor into liquid so they are not found in xray pictures.when in all reality it was liquified now ur immune system is shot what was once on you arm has been liquified and. Has been Sent to flow threw the bloodstream where it will eventually start to solidify now what u had on your arm has spread to the forearm shoulder and organs on or near the initial site of growth….. its true sad but true….. think about it really a tumor just disapears and what happens to its remains? Its common sense its gotta be expelled from the body somehow….if not it won’t be gone.. NOTE; THIS IS A THEORY OPEN YOUR EYES ….PS IF YOU RECEIVE RADIATION TREATMENT OUT OF COUNTRY TREATMENT CENTERS WILL DENY YOU TREATMENT MANY HAVE ONLY ONE REQUIREMENTAND THAT IS YOU HAVE NEVER RECEIVED ANY RADIATION TREATMENT….

        o see it out?

        • David
          Posted January 31, 2013 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

          I have no real opinion on chemotherapy but I would like to point out one very obvious flaw in your liquefaction theory. Cancer cells are not mere chemicals but rather living things. They are not being melted, they are being killed. Once dead, they are removed from the body by the same natural processes that remove all the other waste. A dead cancer cell is not a problem.

          Now, it may be that the process that kills the cancer cells also causes other problems. It may be that not all the cancer cells are dead and some of these may be circulated along with all the dead ones as the body removes them only to lodge in other places and begin growing. I’m not going to argue against that. But, cancer cells are not liquefying and then solidifying later, not even by analogy. It just doesn’t work that way. The analogy is not useful.

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code lang=""> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" extra="">

*